Scarlet Jewels - Category: Inspiration
Fall out and into the unknown abyss whilst the old forms and models are lying and dying. Radicalize. Idealize.


This is my newslog, also known as a weblog or a blog. Come back for frequent updates.

Who is Scarlet Jewels?

Books I'm reading:

Sites to watch:
Co-intelligence Institute
Global Ideas Bank
YES! Magazine
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Free Expression Network
Disinformation
Friendly Favors
Action without borders
Manufacturing Dissent
Wirearchy
Smart Mobs
Disclosure Project
Forbidden Science

People to watch:
Catherine Austin Fitts
Elisabet Sahtouris
John Perry Barlow
Sebastian Fiedler
S?bastien Paquet
David Weinberger
Mitch Ratcliffe
Lawrence Lessig
Jerry Michalski
Hazel Henderson
Chris Corrigan
Steven Johnson
Peter Kaminski
Graham Hancock
Flemming Funch
Ben Hammersley
Anita Roddick
Tom Tomorrow
Tom Munnecke
Britt Blaser
Jean Houston
Noam Chomsky
Mitch Kapor
Chris Locke
Marc Canter
Dan Gillmor
Doc Searls
Dave Winer
Matt Mower
Jon Udell
Ray Ozzie
Kim Baker
Lisa Rein
Tom Atlee
John Robb
Joi Ito

A Quote:

Jewels is now shining in Glastonbury, England, where the time now is:


If you want your own
NewsLog like this,
or you want to
leave comments,
join the
New Civilization
Network


Unique Readers:


Recent Search Engine Searches:

Primarily
Public Domain
 Everything I've written here is hereby placed in the public domain. The quotes from other people's writings, and the pictures used might or might not be copyrighted, but are considered fair use. Thus the license here would best be described as:
Primarily Public Domain.

Syndication:

  [Valid RSS]



WebLog Resources:
NCN NewsLogs
Weblogs.com
blo.gs
Technorati
Organica
DayPop
Blogdex
PopDex
Blogging Ecosystem
BlogTree
BlogStreet
BlogWise
BlogChalking
Wander-Lust

Female/36-40. Lives in United Kingdom/Joshua Tree/Pipe's Canyon, speaks English and . Spends 40% of daytime online. Uses a Normal (56k) connection. And likes writing/ research/systems theories/ futurism.
This is my blogchalk:
United Kingdom, Joshua Tree, Pipe's Canyon, English, , Female, 36-40, writing/ research, systems theories/ futurism.
Saturday, January 11, 2003day link 
 Helmets
pictureI found this funny quote on Rageboy's Blog:

"Wear the helmet as much as you can, especially during times that you feel you are usually abducted. Some persons report complete success just wearing the helmet at night, others report that the aliens became aware when they were not wearing the helmet and took them when they weren't wearing it." (source: [link])

[ | 2003-01-11 10:52 | 4 comments | PermaLink ]  More >

Thursday, December 19, 2002day link 
 Naked States - not lewd but indeed lurid!
pictureMing said yesterday

"I was watching a documentary on HBO about this artist Spencer Tunick who has been traveling America and the world, photographing nude people in unusual settings and arrangements. Now, what was very refreshing and inspiring about that is that there is nothing lewd or even tintilating about how he does it. It is very normal people, not picked based on any standard of physical beauty, but mainly based on that they're real people that one meets on the street. And there is something very powerful and beautiful that comes from that. Besides being art, and performance art, it is activism. It is activism asking us to look at things a bit differently, and breaking through stupid bourgeois norms for what is proper and expected."

I remember watching a documentary about Tunick's work on the ITV last year in the U.K. I would agree that it is very refreshing and radical. That this might indeed be the kind of answer we need to get out and DO: Yes! All size and shapes of nudes for peace, nudes for exposure, nudes for some sort of message and Truth with a capital T.

But I wouldn't say this is NOT lewd and tintilating, only in that we denounce being lewd and tintilating for it's own sake. What is lewd? What is tintilating? When it is cut off from the rest of us, then it is crass and lewd. But do you think this art is NOT erotic? I think it includes being erotic by it's Nature. By not seeming to be about the flesh, but by using the flesh, it becomes even MORE about the flesh... about the flesh we hide and deny. But then the perversions is that there is a lewd and lurid obsession with flesh that 'acts out' the parts of us that have been hidden. Tunick is lurid in that he is vivid. He is NOT obscene in that he IS obscene beyond obscenity. To say he is NOT what he IS, is the transcendence of when things are healing on many levels, dealing with where we are split apart whilst we become whole again just to split ourselves up for the sake of it.

The settings in which his nudes appear in to me are very exciting and arousing because they embody where we are so split from Nature, and thus, bringing the Nude Nature into the setting, is like some pledge from purgatory that is pleading us back into some purpose and inclusive reality. Therefore it's existential and idealistic at once. I am always for radical expressions that include the beauty and bizarre of our human pain and pleasure.
[ | 2002-12-19 14:26 | 5 comments | PermaLink ]  More >



<< Newer stories  Page: 1 2


This site created with
OrgSpace NewsLog
version 1.87